Skip to main content

Fine-Tuning Your AI Experts

Fine-tuning is the process of training your AI expert on specific examples to make it behave exactly as you want. Unlike prompt engineering which guides behavior through instructions, fine-tuning actually modifies the model’s weights to embed your desired behaviors directly.

What is Fine-Tuning?

Fine-tuning takes a pre-trained language model and continues training it on your specific dataset, teaching it to respond in ways that match your exact requirements.

Behavior Training

Teach your expert how to respond in specific situations

Knowledge Enhancement

Add domain-specific knowledge and terminology

Style Adaptation

Match your brand voice and communication style

Performance Improvement

Better accuracy for your specific use cases

Fine-Tuning vs Prompt Engineering

When to use Prompt Engineering:
  • Quick prototyping
  • Testing different approaches
  • Frequently changing requirements
  • Simple behavioral adjustments
  • Instant results needed
When to use Fine-Tuning:
  • Production deployments
  • Consistent brand voice needed
  • Complex domain knowledge
  • Cost optimization (smaller fine-tuned models can replace larger ones)
  • High-volume usage
Key differences:
  • Speed: Prompt engineering is instant, fine-tuning takes time to train
  • Cost: Prompts have no training cost, fine-tuning has upfront training cost but lower inference cost
  • Flexibility: Prompts are easy to change, fine-tuning requires retraining
  • Consistency: Prompts are variable, fine-tuning is highly consistent
  • Data Required: Prompts need none, fine-tuning needs 50-500+ examples

The Fine-Tuning Process in B-Bot Hub

1. Data Collection Phase

Fine-tuning starts with gathering quality training examples:
1

Chat with Your Expert

Use your expert naturally, having real conversations
2

Mark Quality Interactions

When you get a good response, use QA Marking to save it
3

Capture Both Sides

Each marked interaction includes:
  • User question/input
  • Expert’s ideal response
4

Build Your Dataset

Continue marking until you have 50-500+ examples
QA Marking in Chat: When your expert gives a perfect response:
  1. Click the three dots on the message
  2. Select “Start QA Marking”
  3. The interaction is saved to your training dataset
  4. Continue marking good examples
Quality over Quantity: 100 high-quality examples beat 1,000 mediocre ones

2. Training Phase

Once you have enough examples:
1

Access Training

Navigate to Training in the expert menu
2

Review Dataset

See all your marked QA pairs
  • Edit or remove bad examples
  • Ensure diversity of situations
  • Check for consistent quality
3

Configure Training

Set training parameters:
  • Base model to fine-tune
  • Number of epochs
  • Learning rate (advanced)
4

Start Training

Click Start Training Job
  • Training takes 10-60 minutes
  • You’ll be notified when complete

3. Evaluation Phase

After training completes:
  • View all model versions (original + fine-tuned versions)
  • A/B test by switching between versions in chat
  • Compare responses to same questions
  • Set the best version as primary
  • Continue iterative improvement

Training Data Best Practices

Quality Guidelines

Cover different scenarios:
  • Various question types
  • Different tones (formal, casual)
  • Edge cases and unusual requests
  • Common vs rare situations
Why: Model learns to generalize better
Maintain uniform behavior:
  • Same tone across examples
  • Consistent formatting
  • Similar response length patterns
  • Unified brand voice
Why: Model learns predictable behavior
High-quality pairs:
  • Clear user intent
  • Excellent expert response
  • No ambiguity
  • Complete information
Why: Model learns correct patterns
Match real usage:
  • Actual user questions
  • Real-world scenarios
  • Common pain points
  • Typical interactions
Why: Model performs well in production

How Many Examples?

Minimum (50-100 examples):
  • Basic behavior adjustments
  • Simple use cases
  • Style consistency
  • Initial experiments
Recommended (200-500 examples):
  • Production deployments
  • Complex behaviors
  • Domain expertise
  • Robust performance
Advanced (500-5000+ examples):
  • Specialized domains
  • High-stakes applications
  • Maximum performance
  • Complex reasoning

Common Use Cases

1. Brand Voice Training

Ensure consistent brand communication across all interactions by training on examples that match your brand’s specific tone, terminology, and style.

2. Domain Expertise

Create true specialists in medical, legal, technical, or other domains by training on domain-specific terminology, procedures, and best practices.

3. Customer Support

Handle support tickets efficiently with training on common issues, escalation protocols, troubleshooting steps, and professional empathy.

4. Sales & Marketing

Develop expert sales assistants trained on product details, feature comparisons, pricing discussions, and lead qualification approaches.

Cost Optimization

Fine-tuning enables significant cost savings by allowing smaller models to perform as well as larger ones: Before Fine-Tuning:
  • Large Model (GPT-4): $0.03 per 1K tokens
  • Monthly cost (1M tokens): $30,000
After Fine-Tuning:
  • Fine-tuned Smaller Model (GPT-3.5): $0.002 per 1K tokens
  • Monthly cost (1M tokens): $2,000
  • Savings: $28,000/month (93% reduction!)

Best Practices Summary

Start Small

Begin with 50-100 examples, iterate from there

Quality First

Perfect examples > many mediocre ones

Test Thoroughly

A/B test all versions before production

Document Everything

Track what changes between versions

Monitor Continuously

Watch metrics after each deployment

Iterate Often

Small frequent improvements beat big rare ones

Troubleshooting

Possible causes:
  • Insufficient training data
  • Low quality examples
  • Conflicting examples
  • Wrong base model
Solutions:
  • Add more diverse examples
  • Review and clean dataset
  • Ensure consistency
  • Try different base model
Symptoms:
  • Perfect on training data
  • Poor on new questions
  • Too rigid responses
Solutions:
  • Add more diverse examples
  • Reduce training epochs
  • Use regularization
  • Expand dataset variety
Causes:
  • Conflicting examples
  • Ambiguous training data
  • Too few examples
Solutions:
  • Review dataset for conflicts
  • Remove ambiguous examples
  • Add clearer examples
  • Ensure consistency

Next Steps